1. Executive summary
- Team utilisation for March (after holiday adjustment) was ~84%, with individual utilisation between 77% and 91% once Leo’s 40h, Jenine’s 24h and Mercedesz’s 8h holidays are excluded from working time.
- Ticket volume was 2,699 opened and 2,772 closed, with India and Sarah carrying the heaviest ticket loads.
- CSAT remained excellent at 4.80 / 5 from 118 March responses, with ~90% “Very satisfied” and no negative ratings in the March subset.
- Telephony: the CS team handled 1,525 calls (958 inbound, 567 outbound) totalling ~30 hours of talk time; average call duration was ~71 seconds.
- Chats & AI: there were 149 chats in March, with 96 (64%) routed to the AI agent and 36 handled by human agents, mainly Sargun, Vaishali, Yashi and Aanchal.
- Training: the team delivered 58 sessions (Leo 21, Jenine 16, Mercedesz 14, Sarah 7) with all March training-survey respondents rating their session “Very Satisfied”.
2. Utilisation overview
2.1 Adjusted utilisation (including holiday impact)
- Sarah: 100 of 120 working hours
- Jenine: 135 of 173 working hours
- Mercedesz: 127 of 173 working hours
- Leo: 114 of 173 working hours :llmCitationRef[8]
Holiday adjustments (reducing the working-hours denominator):
- Leo: 40h holiday → 173 − 40 = 133 working hours
- Jenine: 24h holiday → 173 − 24 = 149 working hours
- Mercedesz: 8h holiday → 173 − 8 = 165 working hours
- Sarah: no holiday adjustment provided; remains at 120 working hours
| Analyst | Logged hours | Adjusted working hours | Utilisation % (March) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah | 100 | 120 | 83.3% |
| Jenine | 135 | 149 | 90.6% |
| Mercedesz | 127 | 165 | 77.0% |
| Leo | 114 | 133 | 85.7% |
Team overall: 476 logged hours over 567 adjusted working hours → ~84.0% utilisation.
2.2 Holiday overview
- Leo: 40 hours of holiday; utilisation rises from ~65.8% (using 173h) to ~85.7% when holiday is excluded.
- Jenine: 24 hours of holiday; utilisation rises from ~78.1% to ~90.6%.
- Mercedesz: 8 hours of holiday; utilisation rises from ~73.5% to ~77.0%.
- Sarah: no holiday adjustment mentioned; utilisation remains 83.3% (100 / 120h).
2.3 Activity mix (qualitative)
- Sarah: 24h IHG mapping, 6h contacting July renewals, 4h chasing June renewals, 7h on client training, 6h on the 3- and 6-month engagement plan; remainder on support tickets.
- Jenine: 21h IHG mapping, 16h TVD reports, 16h customer training; remainder on tickets and other tasks.
- Mercedesz: 15h IHG mapping, 6h postcode/town correction project, 12.5h chasing aged debt for Finance, 14h customer training; remainder on tickets.
- Leo: 21h on customer-training calls; remaining logged hours on support tickets.
2.4 Tickets and channels as utilisation context
| Total | 2,699 | 2,772 |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst | Tickets opened | Tickets closed |
| Leo | 132 | 109 |
| Mercedesz* | 112 | 127 |
| Jenine | 349 | 378 |
| Sarah* | 723 | 789 |
| Zac | 136 | 132 |
| India | 1,247 | 1,237 |
- Calls (Client Services, Zoom): 1,525 total calls; 958 inbound, 567 outbound; ~29h 58m total call time; ~70.7s average call duration.
- Chats: 149 chats in March overall; AI handled 96 and human agents handled 36 (Sree 0, Vaishali 7, Yashi 7, Sargun 18, Aanchal 4).
3. Customer training activity & feedback
- Sessions delivered (March): GRATIS/Leo 21, Jenine 16, Mercedesz 14, Sarah 7 → 58 sessions (workbook explicitly states this is for the whole of March).
- Surveyed attendees: 11 completed March training surveys (each one attendee).
- Average satisfaction: 5.0 / 5 (all responses “Very Satisfied”).
Top positive themes (trainer not captured in the survey):
- Clarity & understanding – e.g. “During the second session, we went through an example enquiry which enabled me to really understand how the system operates.”; “Clear explanation.”
- Practical, real-time examples – “visual learning, seeing things actually happen in real time.” :llmCitationRef[21]
- Thoroughness & opportunity focus – “Complete analysis of the profile and business opportunities.”
- Helpfulness & attitude – “Very good nature and happy to answer all questions and provide solutions.”
Improvement themes:
- Pace slightly fast – “Maybe explaining things a little slower so I could note it all down.”; “slow down a little.”
- Few other asks – several comments explicitly state they are not sure there is anything to improve. :
Per-person training completion (delivery):
| Trainer | Sessions completed (March) |
|---|---|
| GRATIS/Leo | 21 |
| Jenine | 16 |
| Mercedesz* | 14 |
| Sarah* | 7 |
4. Overall satisfaction survey results
- Total responses (March): 118.
- Average CSAT: 4.80 / 5 (Very satisfied=5, Satisfied=4, Neither=3, Dissatisfied=2, Very dissatisfied=1).
- Distribution: Very satisfied 106 (89.8%); Satisfied 12 (10.2%); 0 responses in other categories in the March subset.
CSAT by agent (Venue Support and others named in March CSV):
| Agent | # responses | Avg CSAT |
|---|---|---|
| Sargunkaur Sethi | 34 | 4.77 |
| Vaishali Adhikari | 30 | 4.87 |
| Yashi Jaiswal | 22 | 4.77 |
| Aanchal Kumari | 11 | 5.00 |
| Sarah Green | 3 | 5.00 |
| Jenine Gibbons | 2 | 5.00 |
| Mercedesz Kotan | 1 | 4.00 |
| Payal Sharma | 1 | 5.00 |
| Siddharth Banga | 1 | 5.00 |
Top positive drivers (with quotes and agents):
- Speed & responsiveness
- “very efficient and quick” – for Aanchal Kumari.
- “Super quick - thanks Team x” – for Aanchal Kumari.
- Proactive resolution & system support
- “The team were straight in on contact when they detected a potential issue (I wasn’t even aware!) and then within thirty minutes, Aanchal had come back and the issue was all resolved! Amazing!” – for Aanchal Kumari.
- “Vaishali was very helpful and patient in helping me resolve my issue :)” – for Vaishali Adhikari. :llmCitationRef[31]
- Helpfulness & communication quality
- “A big thank you to Vaishali Adhikari for responding to my issue so promptly.” :llmCitationRef[32]
- “Really good meeting and the notes were excellent. Very helpful.” – for Jenine Gibbons. :llmCitationRef[33]
Top negative drivers (with quotes and agents):
- Enquiry-closure / opening-hours clarity – “We had an enquiry that came in when the venue was closed for the next day… by the time I looked at the enquiry from home the agent had closed it… it should not be possible to close the enquiry before we are given the opportunity to respond.” – for Sargunkaur Sethi.
- Third-party IT delays (Waterstons) – “The issue wasn’t resolved quickly by the Waterstons help desk… another member of Waterston’s… resolved the issues quickly & efficiently.” – survey lists Vaishali Adhikari as agent, but the delay sits with external IT.
5. Weekly & monthly trends
Channel totals (Monthly Data – February vs March). :llmCitationRef[36]
| Metric | February | March |
|---|---|---|
| Calls in | 824 | 518 |
| Tickets (Freshdesk) | 2,627 | 1,517 |
| Chats | 248 | 149 |
| Sub-forms | 153 | 49 |
citation_23:78,citation_23:93
- Tickets: 2,699 opened vs 2,772 closed; India and Sarah are the main volume carriers.
- First-response & resolution times: not available numerically for March in the workbook; cannot be reported.
- Calls (Zoom): concentrated across Sarah, Jenine, Leo, Mercedesz and Zachary, with short average durations (27–83s for most agents; ~180s for Zachary, reflecting likely escalations).
- Chats & AI: AI handled 96 of 149 chats; human workload concentrated with Sargun, Vaishali, Yashi and Aanchal. :llmCitationRef[39]
- Training: 58 sessions spread through the month, with significant clusters mid- to late March across the H10 group and several UK venues.